Placeholder Content Image

Sculpture worth $42,000 shatters at art fair

<p dir="ltr">Pieces of an iconic sculpture are now in high demand, after the renowned work smashed to pieces. </p> <p dir="ltr">At a Miami art fair, Jeff Koons’ well-known piece Balloon Dog (Blue), worth $42,000, was being showcased at the fair’s VIP preview night. </p> <p dir="ltr">Unfortunately, the 16-inch-tall sculpture would never make it to public viewing, after an art collector accidentally bumped into its transparent pedestal, sending the artwork falling to the floor where it shattered beyond repair. </p> <p dir="ltr">“Before I knew it, they were picking up the Jeff Koons pieces in a dustpan with a broom,” Stephen Gamson, an art collector and artist who was in attendance, told the <em><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/18/arts/jeff-koons-sculpture-broken-miami.html">New York Times</a></em>.</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <p dir="ltr" lang="en">Jeff Koons’ Balloon Dog sculpture was accidentally broken into a thousand pieces by a visitor. </p> <p>The art piece was worth $42,000. <a href="https://t.co/fqHTIKpT5I">pic.twitter.com/fqHTIKpT5I</a></p> <p>— Pop Tingz (@ThePopTingz) <a href="https://twitter.com/ThePopTingz/status/1628070672600645635?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 21, 2023</a></p></blockquote> <p dir="ltr">“It was an event!” Bénédicte Caluch, an art advisor with Bel-Air Fine Art, tells the<em> <a href="https://www.miamiherald.com/entertainment/visual-arts/article272539097.html">Miami Herald</a></em>. </p> <p dir="ltr">“Everybody came to see what happened. It was like when Banksy’s artwork was shredded.”</p> <p dir="ltr">Nervous attendees crowded around the shattered artwork, curious if the destruction was part of a larger stunt. </p> <p dir="ltr">However, as staff members stepped in to help clean the sculpture away, the onlookers quickly realised that was not the case. </p> <p dir="ltr">“Of course it is heartbreaking to see such an iconic piece destroyed,” Cédric Boero, Bel-Air Fine Art’s district manager, told <em>CNN</em>. </p> <p dir="ltr">The art collector didn’t intend to break the piece, but “this kind of thing unfortunately happens,” he adds. “That is why the artwork was covered by insurance.”</p> <p dir="ltr">An insurance expert will evaluate the pieces of the sculpture, which have been placed in a box for safekeeping.</p> <p dir="ltr">Art collector Stephen Gamson is among many who have offered to buy the now-destroyed artwork, with the gallery continuing to receive offers. </p> <p dir="ltr">“I find value in it even when it’s broken,” Gamson says to the <em>Miami Herald</em>. “To me, it’s the story. It makes the art even more interesting.”</p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

Art

Placeholder Content Image

"Just not fair": Australia's most-decorated Olympian's trans stance

<p dir="ltr">Olympic star Emma McKeon has taken a stance against transgender athletes competing in women’s sport.</p> <p dir="ltr">The five-time gold medallist said “it’s just not fair” to be competing against transgender athletes during a seminar at Griffith University.</p> <p dir="ltr">Her comments came as Prime Minister Scott Morrison backs Liberal candidate for Warringah Katherine Deves, who caused an uproar by declaring trans teenagers are “surgically mutilated” and that the rainbow Pride flag “triggers” her.</p> <p dir="ltr">"I personally wouldn't want to be racing against someone who is biologically a male, so that's a concern," McKeon said.</p> <p dir="ltr">"It's not a new thing, but it's new in that sport, swimming, are going to have to deal with it."</p> <p dir="ltr">McKeon believes it won’t “come to the point” where she is competing against a transgender opponent.</p> <p dir="ltr">“I don't think I'm going to have to race against a trans swimmer, I don't think it's going to come to that point,” she continued.</p> <p dir="ltr">“But now that it's a growing thing, the sport has to think about how to handle it and how to deal with it, because you do want to be inclusive, but you don't want to have females racing against swimmers who are biologically male because it's just not fair.”</p> <p dir="ltr">Laurel Hubbard from New Zealand competed in women’s weightlifting at the 2021 Tokyo Olympics which sparked a debate on the fairness of the competition.</p> <p dir="ltr">New Zealand's Laurel Hubbard sparked debate when she competed in women's weightlifting at the 2021 Tokyo Olympics.</p> <p dir="ltr">Australia’s Hannah Mouncey, a former men’s national handball player wanted to compete in AFLW and was rejected with the AFL being taken to court.</p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: Getty</em></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Vanity Fair slammed for "distorted" Nicole Kidman cover

<p dir="ltr">Fashion giant <em>Vanity Fair</em> has come under fire for unattainable beauty standards, after images of Nicole Kidman’s cover of the magazine <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-18/vanity-fair-photoshop-disaster-on-nicole-kidman-cover/100842684" target="_blank" rel="noopener">sparked debate</a> online.</p> <p dir="ltr">The 54-year-old actress, styled in Italian high fashion label Miu Miu, posed for the cover of the magazine’s “Hollywood Issue”, prompting some to allege the magazine used excessive photoshopping.</p> <blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/CaFFB8aLARD/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"> </div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;"> <div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: 8px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: auto;"> <div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"> </div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CaFFB8aLARD/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Vanity Fair (@vanityfair)</a></p> </div> </blockquote> <p dir="ltr">Many have backed up these allegations with claims Kidman’s knee pops out at an angle that is incongruous with her foot and that the line of her left oblique is right next to her belly button.</p> <p dir="ltr">One commenter compared the photo to the video accompanying <em><a href="https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2022/02/nicole-kidman-2022-hollywood-portfolio?itm_content=inline&amp;itm_campaign=hollywood-portfolio-recirc" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Vanity Fair</a></em>’s cover story and pointed out differences between them, despite it being technologically possible for videos to also be retouched.</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <p dir="ltr" lang="en">Airbrushing is done on the body, so she’s still airbrushed. Also, videos can be tweaked. Even still, compare the still from the video (right) to the cover (left). The cover photo is obviously distorted. <a href="https://t.co/8OnYAqEjVw">pic.twitter.com/8OnYAqEjVw</a></p> <p>— Lisa Strawn (@lparke) <a href="https://twitter.com/lparke/status/1494437479193137152?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 17, 2022</a></p></blockquote> <p dir="ltr">“No 54-year-old’s body looks like that, not even Nicole Kidman’s. Why are we still doing this s**t?” one popular response on Twitter read.</p> <p dir="ltr">“She is a beautiful woman and can do whatever she wants with her body. It’s a criticism of the magazine’s stylistic choices and insane airbrushing.”</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <p dir="ltr" lang="en">Even beyond the bizarre styling and weirdo creative direction… this is just straight shoddy photoshop work…duplicated flower patch clear as day, foot becoming one with the grass…unclear if she is a missing part of her hip…smh that this got signed off on by so many.. <a href="https://t.co/axIu24XhkL">pic.twitter.com/axIu24XhkL</a></p> <p>— Puppybrother (@puppybrother12) <a href="https://twitter.com/puppybrother12/status/1494436334949203968?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 17, 2022</a></p></blockquote> <p dir="ltr">Other eagle-eyed critics pointed out other inconsistencies, such as flowers cloned behind Kidman and her shoe “becoming one with the grass”.</p> <p dir="ltr">The cover photo also seems to contradict the accompanying interview, where Kidman opens up about health issues she has experienced as a result of being in the public eye.</p> <p dir="ltr">She told <em>Vanity Fair</em> she often tricked her immune system into thinking that the suffering her characters experienced was real, only to fall ill after filming.</p> <p dir="ltr">“Parts of the body don’t know, a lot of the time, what the difference is (between acting and real-life),” she explained.</p> <p dir="ltr">The Australian star spoke of one example where she got sick after filming the TV series <em>Big Little Lies</em>, in which she played an abuse survivor.</p> <p dir="ltr">“I’ve started to understand a bit more to take care of yourself,” she said.</p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: @vanityfair (Instagram)</em></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

With commercial galleries an endangered species, are art fairs a necessary evil?

<p>Although record numbers of people are flocking to exhibitions in the major public art galleries, foot traffic into commercial art galleries is dwindling at an alarming rate. Embarrassed gallery directors of well-established and well-known commercial art galleries will quietly confess that frequently they scarcely get more than a dozen visitors a day. Outside the flurry of activity on the day of the opening, very little happens for the duration of the show.</p> <p>This is not a peculiarity of the Australian art scene, I have heard similar accounts in London, Manhattan and Paris. The art public has largely ceased visiting commercial art galleries as a regular social activity and art collectors are frequently buying over the internet or through art fairs. In fact, many galleries admit that most of their sales occur via their websites, through commissions or at art fairs, with a shrinking proportion from exhibitions or their stockroom by actual walk-in customers.</p> <p>The commercial art galleries have become an endangered species and their numbers are shrinking before our eyes. Leaving aside China and its urban arts precincts, such as <a href="http://www.798district.com/">798 Art Zone in Beijing</a>, again this is a trend that can be noted in much of Europe, America and Australasia.</p> <p>At the same time, the art market is relatively buoyant, albeit somewhat differently configured from the traditional one. The art auction market in many quarters is thriving and, as persistent rumours have it, not infrequently auction houses leave their role as purely a secondary market and increasingly source work directly from artists’ studios. This seeps into their lavish catalogues.</p> <p>The other booming part of the art trade is the art fairs. Here I will pause on a case study of the <a href="http://www.artfair.co.nz/">Auckland Art Fair 2019</a>. Started by a charitable trust about a dozen years ago and run as a biennial, in 2016 the fair, with new sponsorship and a new management team of Stephanie Post and Hayley White, was reorientated. As of 2018, it has become an annual art fair with a focus on the Pacific Rim region. It remains the only major art fair in New Zealand.</p> <p>Situated in The Cloud, a scenic setting on Queens Wharf in central Auckland, this location also limits its size to create an intimate, friendly, human-scale fair, unlike the vast expanses of the <a href="http://www.expochicago.com/">Chicago Art Fair</a> or even <a href="http://www.sydneycontemporary.com.au/">Sydney Contemporary</a> in the Carriageworks.</p> <p>The nuts and bolts of the Auckland Art Fair is that galleries from the Pacific Rim region can apply to exhibit and a curatorial committee of four curators, two from public galleries and two from commercial ones, select about 40 galleries for participation. The event, which is held over five days, attracts about 10,000 visitors and generates between $6-7 million in art sales.</p> <p>The fair costs about $1 million to stage with 90% of this sum raised from sponsorship, ticket sales and gallery fees and the rest a grant from Auckland Tourism, Events and Economic Development. The public pays an admission fee of between $25-30, depending on when they book.</p> <p>Art fairs are popular with local governments as they invariably attract people and businesses into the city. In Auckland Art Fair 2019, held in the first week in May, there were 41 galleries participating, almost 30 from various parts of NZ, the rest from Sydney, Melbourne, Hobart, Shanghai, Jakarta, Rarotonga (Cook Islands) and Santiago.</p> <p>According to Stephanie Post, a major purpose of the fair is to build a new art audience and, by extension, a new generation of art collectors. The fair is designed to fill the gap between the primary and secondary art markets. For this reason, there is a whole series of “projects” that generally promote new art, frequently by emerging artists, many currently without representation by a commercial art gallery. In 2019 there were ten of these non-commercial projects at the fair.</p> <p>These projects, for the past three art fairs, have been curated by Francis McWhannell, who now plans to step aside to be replaced by a new set of curatorial eyes. There are also various lectures, talks, panel discussions and related exhibitions. This year, most notably, there is “China Import Direct”, a curated cross-section of digital and video art from across China with some stunning and quite edgy material by Yuan Keru, Wang Newone and Lu Yang, amongst others.</p> <h2>A mixed bag</h2> <p>Predictably, art at the Auckland Art Fair 2019 is a mixed bag, but the stronger works do outnumber those that are best passed over in silence. In terms of sales, within the first couple of hours quite a number of the big-ticket items were sold, such as work by the Australians Patricia Piccinini and Dale Frank.</p> <p>Looking around this year’s fair, some of the highlights included Seraphine Pick at Michael Lett; Robert Ellis at Bowerbank Ninow; Max Gimblett at Gow Longsford Gallery; Anne Wallace and Juan Davila at Kalli Rolfe; Christine Webster at Trish Clark; Daniel Unverricht and Richard Lewer at Suite, Toss Woollaston at Page Blackie Gallery, Dame Robin White and Gretchen Albrecht at Two Rooms; Robyn Kahukiwa at Warwick Henderson Gallery; Geoff Thornley at Fox Jensen McCrory; Simon Kaan at Sanderson; James Ormsby at Paulnache and Kai Wasikowski at the Michael Bugelli Gallery.</p> <p>This selective list of names, to which many others can be added, indicates something of the spread and diversity of the artists being presented at the fair – not only in style and medium, but in the whole range of languages of visualisation and conceptualisation. Although there are a few deceased artists included, like Mirdidingkingathi Juwarnda Sally Gabori and Colin McCahon (neither represented by a particularly strong work), like most art fairs there is a predominance of well-established blue chip artists, a scattering of art market darlings plus a few unexpected newcomers.</p> <p>A criticism of art fairs is that they are an expensive market place with high overhead costs, which discourage too much experimentation with “untested” emerging artists. Despite the welcome initiatives of the “projects”, Auckland in this respect falls into line with the pattern of most fairs.</p> <p>The oft-repeated claim that they create a new art audience is also difficult to quantify. Although anecdotal evidence suggests that many who go to fairs may not have ever entered a commercial art gallery before, this does not appear to be followed up by a conversion of this audience into regular gallery goers.</p> <h2>A spectacle</h2> <p>Art fairs and blockbuster exhibitions in public art galleries have become popular people magnet events. They are a form of entertainment that is becoming more of a surrogate for consuming art than some sort of conduit for a return to more traditional patterns of art appreciation and acquisition. They are noisy, crowded and colourful spectacles – more like a party than a quiet arena for the contemplation of art.</p> <p>Is this such a bad thing? Observing the spectacle in Auckland, I was struck by the youthfulness of the thousands of visitors. For many, it seemed the idea that they could afford to purchase an original artwork came as a revelation. Perhaps this was not a $100,000 painting by a major artist, but something more modest and frequently more to their tastes. Nevertheless, new buyers are being introduced to original art and this in itself has to be a positive development.</p> <p>Art fairs globally are breeding a cult of dependency with some “commercial” art galleries increasingly divesting themselves of a physical existence and living from fair to fair. For a while, this was a complete no-no and fairs insisted that participant galleries had a bricks-and-mortar existence, but in many instances the borders are fudged and to be a gallery you need only be an established art trading entity.</p> <p>Art fairs are here to stay; the future of commercial art galleries is far more problematic.</p> <p><em>Image credit: Getty Images</em></p> <p><em>This article first appeared on <a rel="noopener" href="https://theconversation.com/with-commercial-galleries-an-endangered-species-are-art-fairs-a-necessary-evil-116680" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>. </em></p>

Art

Placeholder Content Image

Prince Charles is "immensely sensitive" and ignoring Prince Harry

<p>Princess Diana's former voice coach, Stewart Pearce, has claimed the reason Prince Charles has had a hard time with Prince Harry's parenting criticisms is that Prince Charles is "immensely sensitive".</p> <p>Pearce revealed to US Weekly that the future king of England is a "very very shy man".</p> <p>“Prince Charles is a very, very shy man, a very sensitive and delicate man, but we see his public personality, but in private, he’s immensely sensitive,” he said.</p> <p>“When we’re sensitive, if we’re dealing with very strong, combustible emotion on the outside of us,” people tend to go into fight or flight.</p> <p>For example, when Princess Diana accused him of having an affair with Camilla Parker Bowles, “what he did was to shrink back and as a result of that became aloof,” Pearce explained. “Well, that doesn’t heal the challenge that’s taking place.”</p> <p>Pearce said that when reports broke about Prince Harry and Meghan being "troubled" by the 'lapse of contact", Pearce wasn't surprised as "that's what Charles does".</p> <p>“He can’t deal with it because of his sensitivity, so he hides. And what Harry’s trying to do is to heal that. Not out of umbrage, not out of anger or revenge or criticism or accusation…I felt that he was just somebody saying, ‘This is the way that it is, and this is why we want to make change.’”</p> <p>The comments that Pearce is referring to were made by Prince Harry on his Apple TV+ series with Oprah The Me You Can't See.</p> <p>“My father used to say to me when I was younger, he used to say to [Prince] William and I, ‘Well, it was like that for me, so it’s gonna be like that for you.’" he said.</p> <blockquote style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/B2bL_xMgwoL/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="13"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/B2bL_xMgwoL/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank">A post shared by Clarence House (@clarencehouse)</a></p> </div> </blockquote> <p>"That doesn’t make sense. Just because you suffered, it doesn’t mean that your kids have to suffer. In fact, quite the opposite. If you suffered, do everything you can to make sure that whatever experiences, negative experiences that you had, you can make it right for your kids.”</p> <p>The conversation was said to leave Prince Charles "quite devastated" according to an insider who told <a href="https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2021/05/all-charles-has-wanted-is-for-harry-to-be-happy-can-this-father-son-relationship-ever-heal"><em>Vanity Fair.</em></a></p> <p>“He is such a gentle man and a dedicated father first and foremost. Knowing him, he’ll be feeling wretched and will take no joy or happiness in what’s going on within the family. But he will also want to seek a reconciliation. He is not vindictive at all, and he wants to make peace with Harry.”</p>

International Travel

Placeholder Content Image

Not fair! Aldi shopper with huge Special Buys haul sparks fury

<p>A group of Aldi shoppers have slammed a man online after he bought a haul of Special Buys items in one go.</p> <p>As keen shoppers rushed to the store to get a $69.99 Stand Mixer when they hit the shelves, many walked away empty handed due to limited stock.</p> <p>However, an annoyed shopper who was disgruntled that they missed out took to Facebook to slam a man for buying six when they couldn’t even purchase one.</p> <p>She posted to the Aldi Mums Facebook page explaining the situation.</p> <p>“I went to Aldi this morning at 8.30 am to buy a stand mixer from Special Buys today,” she posted in the group.</p> <p>“I end up having nothing at 8.35 am because of this. Is it fair? As per ALDI staff, they can't put any limits on Special Buys. That guy ended up buying six of the stand mixers.”</p> <p>People in the group were quick to agree, saying that there should be a limit on how many you can purchase in one go.</p> <p>“Two is ok but not six, they should limit it,” one user wrote on the post.</p> <p>“Not fair at all. This always happens,” another user agreed.</p> <p>Some commenters were curious as to why he had bought so many.</p> <p>“And I bet he will sell them for more online. I hate people who do that,” one user commented.</p> <p>Others jumped to the defence of the man, saying he can purchase whatever he likes.</p> <p>“It's his business of why he had so many, not for the rest of Australia to judge,” one user wrote.</p> <p>“Maybe he's the nominated shopper for the street? Maybe he has a big family? Maybe we should mind our own business,” another commented.</p> <p>“Don't know who's worse… The guy with the trolley or the person taking the photo,” another added.</p>

Money & Banking

Placeholder Content Image

Juries need to be told how they're allowed to use the internet to ensure fair trials

<p><span><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/jemma-holt-940717">Jemma Holt</a>, <em><a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-tasmania-888">University of Tasmania</a></em> and <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/brendan-gogarty-146584">Brendan Gogarty</a>, <em><a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-tasmania-888">University of Tasmania</a></em></span></p> <p>Juries are supposed to consider evidence without influence or bias from the outside world. However, the <a href="https://www.consultancy.com.au/news/616/9-out-of-10-australian-citizens-now-own-a-smartphone">widespread access to and use of the internet and social media</a> threatens to undermine this, with significant consequences for our criminal justice system and those within it.</p> <p>Given courts cannot effectively police smart-phone use they must adapt to it. This week the <a href="https://www.utas.edu.au/law-reform">Tasmania Law Reform Institute</a> completed its <a href="https://cdn.theconversation.com/static_files/files/842/Jurors_and_Social_Media_FR_A4_04_secure.pdf?1579503016">year long inquiry</a> into courts and the information age, and has recommendations as to how they can adapt.</p> <div class="embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9"><iframe class="embed-responsive-item" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RxmrZ7y9cwg"></iframe></div> <div class="embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9"><strong>The right to a fair &amp; unbiased trial by your peers</strong></div> <p>An accused person’s right to a fair trial is the most fundamental principle of our criminal justice system. It is a phrase that describes a system that affords an accused person many protections. That system relies on jurors being impartial and returning a verdict that is based solely on the evidence that is presented within the courtroom.</p> <p>In the past this was readily easy to achieve. Juror communications during trial hours and even after them could be controlled. News about the trial was generally a local affair, and even when it attracted national attention, the journalists needed to be in the court’s jurisdiction to report, so they and their employers were subject to the court’s authority.</p> <p>The shift in the way people access news, information and communications in the modern age has changed this reality.</p> <p>Almost every Australian has access to the internet via their smartphone or other devices, social media use is habitual among much of our population, and the internet is a ubiquitous source of information for most people.</p> <p>Jurors are no different – in fact, they represent the wider Australian community these statistics describe. While jurors’ smart phones are removed from them during trial, they cannot be before or after the trial period, nor at the beginning or end of the day. As a result jurors may intentionally, or simply by habit seek out or communicate information about the trial.</p> <p><strong>Use and misuse of social media</strong></p> <p>Between 2018 and 2020 the Tasmanian Law Reform Institute conducted an inquiry into juror misuse of the internet and social media during trials. The institute concluded there is likely to be a high, but unquantifiable and undetectable level of misuse.</p> <p>However, there is evidence across Australian jurisdictions that jurors have used their internet connected devices to:</p> <ul> <li> <p>research legal terms or concepts or other information relevant to the trial. A West Australian juror in a drug-related trial obtained information online about <a href="https://www.watoday.com.au/national/western-australia/calls-to-overhaul-wa-jury-system-after-juror-dismissed-for-facebook-post-20161012-gs0wwa.html">methylamphetamine production</a></p> </li> <li> <p>research the accused, witnesses, victims, lawyers or the judge. Two South Australian jurors sitting in a blackmail trial against multiple defendants conducted online searches about the accused which disclosed <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-22/jurors-fined-for-contempt-of-court/7533472">past outlaw motorcycle gang affiliations</a></p> </li> <li> <p>communicate with people involved in the trial. Multiple New South Wales jurors on a long-running fraud trial <a href="https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/jury-getting-off-their-facebooks/news-story/26e2549a7d9063ae9dae0e2a27683dce">became Facebook friends</a>, sharing posts such as a digitally altered photo of one of the jurors wearing a judge’s wig</p> </li> <li> <p>publish material about the trial on the internet or social media. A NSW juror sitting in a sexual offending trial posted on Facebook <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/facebook-post-sparks-probe-into-jury-conduct-in-sex-crime-trial-20190414-p51dz4.html">the day before the guilty verdict was returned</a>: “When a dog attacks a child it is put down. Shouldn’t we do the same with sex predators?” This post was accompanied with a photograph that showed images of rooms and implements by which lawful executions are carried out.</p> </li> </ul> <p>Misuse is under-reported. In those few instance where reports are made, fellow jurors, rather than court officers, tend to be the ones who raise the issue. Indeed, it is an important part of their role.</p> <p>While jurors across Australia are currently told not to conduct online research, wilful disobedience is only part of the problem. It can also involve unintentional acts by jurors who believe they are doing the right thing.</p> <p>For instance, jurors accessing online news, entertainment or social media sites can be passively influenced by information relevant to the trial. Jurors often misunderstand their role and conduct independent research in the genuine belief their actions are in the pursuit of “fairness” or discovering the truth.</p> <p><strong>Educate, inform &amp; encourage self-regulation</strong></p> <p>The law reform institute ultimately concluded it is impossible for, and beyond the capacity of courts to completely police juror internet use. It has thus recommended not reforming the law, but rather strengthening and standardising juror education and directions. These recommendations are divided across two stages of jury selection, as part of an overall strategy:</p> <ul> <li> <p>pre-selection: prospective jurors should receive improved training and information about the role of the juror and the risks of internet use</p> </li> <li> <p>post-selection: once a jury has been selected, judges need to explain to jurors what dangers arise from using the internet to access and publish on social media, seeking information about the case, parties, court officers, lawyers, and self-conducted research into legal concepts or sentences. The report has recommended the court adopt minimum standard directions, but also have the flexibility to make specific directions relevant to any particular trial.</p> </li> </ul> <p>The report recommended certain current practices and laws should remain unchanged, including:</p> <ul> <li> <p>removing phones from jurors while they are in court (even though the effect is limited it avoids juror distraction)</p> </li> <li> <p>leaving contempt (punishment) laws in place for those jurors who intentionally ignore court training and directions. That might include monetary fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment.</p> </li> </ul> <p>This process is aimed at encouraging self-regulation among jurors, by educating them how to curtail their internet use and why it’s so important.</p> <p><em><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/jemma-holt-940717">Jemma Holt</a>, Research Fellow/ Acting Executive Officer (Research), Tasmania Law Reform Institute, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-tasmania-888">University of Tasmania</a> and <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/brendan-gogarty-146584">Brendan Gogarty</a>, Senior Lecturer / Clinical Director / Director (Acting) Tas Law Reform Institue, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-tasmania-888">University of Tasmania</a></em></p> <p><em>This article is republished from <a href="http://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/juries-need-to-be-told-how-theyre-allowed-to-use-the-internet-to-ensure-fair-trials-130127">original article</a>.</em></p>

Technology

Placeholder Content Image

Prince Charles’ candid interview about becoming King: “There are so many things that need to be done”

<p>A new feature story has given a fascinating insight into Prince Charles, the man who will be the King of England, and his wife Duchess Camilla.</p> <p>Journalist James Reginato has spoken to a number of royal insiders including the 69-year-old Prince’s close friends and colleagues, and the heir to the throne himself for a new<span> </span><em>Vanity Fair</em><span> </span>story.</p> <p>The Duke of Cornwall, who turns 70 this month, told the journalist that “there are so many things that need to be done,” reports <a rel="noopener" href="https://www.nowtolove.com.au/royals/british-royal-family/prince-charles-vanity-fair-interview-52190" target="_blank">now to love</a>. Interviewees lift the veil on his relationship with Duchess Camilla, who he married in 2005. </p> <p>One royal correspondent said, <span>"She's made a massive difference in him,” and that they have "great affection and humour between them.”</span></p> <p>Royal photographer Alexi Lubomirski described the couple’s chemistry at a photo shoot at Clarence House saying, <span>"As soon as they looked at each other, there was a sparkle in their eyes – that's when the magic happened."</span></p> <p>Lubomirski added, "You feel like they are a young couple in love."</p> <p>There are still questions about exactly what title Duchess Camilla will have when Prince Charles assumes the throne, with some reports saying it will be 'Queen Consort'. A royal insider told the magazine that the Duchess of Cornwall has the right disposition to be Queen as she "never complains", and "there's nothing lightweight about her. She's not a bullsh**ter and she doesn't take any bulls**t".</p> <p>"She knows that he is the boss, the star,” her nephew, Ben Elliot, said of his aunt when her husband takes the throne. </p> <p>“She does everything she can possibly do to support him. At the same time, he's very proud of her. She's very sharp and perceptive."</p> <p><span>The feature story also looks at the future monarch’s charitable efforts, such as The Prince’s Trust which has assisted more than 870,000 disadvantaged find employment and receive job training. The former CEO of Prince Charles’ charities, Dame Julia Cleverdon, told <em>Vanity Fair</em> that her former boss is </span><span>"a great connector – the ultimate networker".</span></p> <p>"He creatively swipes ideas from all over the world,” she said. “Then he'll say, for example, 'Why hasn't this one been implemented in Dorset?'"</p> <p>The Prince’s conservation efforts are also explored in the feature, in which he told journalist Reginato that one of his duties was to “find solutions to the vast challenges we face over accelerating climate change".</p> <p>"If we don't engage with these issues, and many other related and critical problems that they inevitably compound, we will all be the victims,” he said. “Nothing escapes."</p> <p>The story also confirmed the already reported fondness the Prince has for his new daughter-in-law Duchess Meghan.</p> <p>"They clearly really like each other,” said a close family friend. “There is real warmth and support. Camilla has been very helpful to Meghan.”</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Tips on being a fair mother-in-law and grandmother

<p>Being a fair mother-in-law can be tricky business. It’s a high stakes game where one false move can cause long lasting and far reaching ripples. The role of the mother-in-law is an important one, however, as it helps foster healthy family dynamics as well as impact you as a grandmother.</p> <p>Mother-in-law relationships come in two varieties: Mother-in-law/daughter-in-law, in which the biological child is a son, and mother-in-law/son-in-law, in which the biological child is a daughter. According to research recently published in Time magazine, the combination of mother-in-law and daughter-in-law is responsible for most of troubled relationships. It was reported that 60 per cent of daughters-in-law reported stressful relationships with their mothers-in-law, as opposed to only 15 per cent of sons-in-law.</p> <p>The reason behind the stress so commonly reported in mother-in-law/daughter-in-law relationships is due to the inherent tension that can come from women who are the “primary female” in their respective families. Despite parenting being very different now than it was a few decades ago, childcare is still the primary responsibility of the woman in many families making it a hot button topic and one fraught with opportunities for criticism, either meant or unwittingly implied.</p> <p><strong>The best way to keep the peace? Avoid the following:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Criticism! Don’t be critical either directly, in-directly or “in secret”.</li> <li>Leave possession at the door. Some conflict can arise from the fact that the daughter-in-law is now the most important woman in the son’s life, where as before it was his mother. Mothers should never, ever ask or expect their son to choose between her his wife. It can never end well for all involved.</li> <li>Be helpful but not too helpful. A fair mother-in-law can be a complete gem, helping with childcare, cooking, cleaning even groceries. But while these activities are often gratefully received, always ensure you’re not overstepping the mark. Your daughter-in-law may actually enjoy the chance to pop to the shops without the kids, instead of delivering groceries, offer to take the kids so she can get out unencumbered for an hour.</li> <li>Always, always respect boundaries.</li> </ul> <p>How do you foster a positive relationship with your daughter or son-in-law? Share your tips with us in the comments below.</p> <p><strong>Related links:</strong></p> <p><a href="/lifestyle/family-pets/2016/08/is-it-ever-okay-for-children-to-lie/"><strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Is it ever okay for children to lie?</span></em></strong></a></p> <p><a href="/lifestyle/family-pets/2016/08/how-to-encourage-kids-to-love-cooking/"><strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">5 reasons why it’s important to let kids loose in the kitchen</span></em></strong></a></p> <p><a href="/lifestyle/family-pets/2016/08/expert-advice-for-coping-with-estranged-adult-children/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong>Expert advice for coping with estranged adult children</strong></em></span></a></p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

Bruce Springsteen shares his heartbreaking secret

<p>In an interview with Vanity Fair, Bruce Springsteen has shared the heartbreaking secret and the inner turmoil he’s had to deal with throughout the years.</p> <p>The Boss made a brave confession in the tell-all interview where he stated that he had been suffering from depression for more than 30 years. The singer also admitted he had concerns he’d face the same fate as his father, who struggled with the illness.</p> <p>Springsteen said, “You don’t know the illness’s parameters. Can I get sick enough to where I become a lot more like my father than I thought I might? I was crushed between 60 and 62, good for a year and out again from 63 to 64. Not a good record.”</p> <p>The man behind iconic hits like Born in the USA and Dancing in the Dark is set to go into more detail in his upcoming book Born to Run which, according to his wife Patti Scialfa, was a cathartic process that help Springsteen deal with a lot of anguish.</p> <p>Scialfa said, “He approached the book the way he would approach writing a song, and a lot of times, you solve something that you’re trying to figure out through the process of writing — you bring something home to yourself.”</p> <p><strong>Related links:</strong></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><a href="/news/news/2016/03/91-year-old-dances-bruce-springsteen/"><strong>Bruce Springsteen dances with 91-year-old superfan</strong></a></em></span></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><a href="/news/news/2016/03/bruce-springsteen-dances-with-mother/"><strong>Bruce Springsteen boogies with his mother while performing</strong></a></em></span></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="/news/news/2016/02/dad-blames-bruce-springsteen-for-tardiness/">Dad blames Bruce Springsteen for daughter’s tardiness to school</a></strong></em></span></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Queen Elizabeth II and her corgis pose for Vanity Fair cover

<p>To mark her 90th birthday, Queen Elizabeth has posed with her corgis for the cover of Vanity Fair.</p> <p>Captured by celebrity photographer Annie Leibovitz, the photo of the Queen in the intimate setting of her home at Windsor Castle was an additional picture taken when the monarch posed for<a href="/news/news/2016/04/photos-queen-windsor-castle-annie-leibowitz/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong> three official photographs at Easter to mark her 90th birthday. </strong></span></a></p> <p>The cover shot shows Her Majesty seated on a rug surrounded by her four pets – two corgis, Willow and Holly, and two dorgis, Candy and Vulcan.</p> <p>Another photo shows the Duke of Edinburgh and the Queen sitting on the sofa in Windsor Castle next to a roaring fire.</p> <p>Leibovitz told Vanity Fair: “The most moving, important thing about this shoot is that these were all her ideas.”</p> <p>She added, “She wanted to be photographed with her grandchildren and great-grandchildren; her husband, Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh; her daughter, Anne, the Princess Royal; and her corgis. I was told how relaxed she was at Windsor, and it was really true. You get the sense of how at peace she was with herself, and very much enthralled with her family.”</p> <p>Scroll through the gallery above to see the exclusive photos. </p> <p><strong>Related links: </strong></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="/news/news/2016/05/duke-and-duchess-of-cambridge-pet-names/"><em>Revealed: the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s nicknames for each other</em></a></strong></span></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="/news/news/2016/05/what-you-didnt-notice-about-this-royal-photo/"><em>The one thing no one noticed about this royal photo</em></a></strong></span></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><em><a href="/news/news/2016/05/10-photos-of-the-royal-family-at-the-chelsea-flower-show/">10 best photos of the Royal Family at the 2016 Chelsea Flower Show</a></em></strong></span></p>

Beauty & Style

Placeholder Content Image

60-somethings make a statement on Vanity Fair’s Hollywood issue

<p>Vanity Fair’s 2016 Hollywood Issue has hit stands with a powerful message.</p> <p>Featuring a "girls only” front cover, one of the key messages revolves around the older ladies of the group, who steal the show with their elegance. The take home message? Women of all ages, races, shapes, sizes and guises have a significant place in Hollywood – and the world, for that matter.  </p> <p>Another interesting element of note is why the four women who appear before the fold were chose – Jane Fonda, Cate Blanchett, Viola Davis, and Jennifer Lawrence. Each of these women have spoken out – and spoken candidly – about issues and experiences they have face in Hollywood as women. </p> <p>For instance, Cate Blanchett spoke about "lazy thinking" where women, both behind and in front of the camera, aren't given enough chances to succeed. Whereas Viola Davis has been vocal about the need for diversity and the lack of roles for people of colour and Jennifer Lawrence used her own experiences to shine a light on the unequal pay for women in Hollywood.</p> <p>Jane Fonda got on her soapbox about the need for equal representation of women and men in film,  saying "I want young women in particular to know that you can stand up for yourself and fight for what you believe in and still work," Jane Fonda told the magazine. "This is not the '50s anymore."  </p> <p>This front cover makes the statement that women have power and will not be ignored, not in Hollywood, and not in this world.</p> <p><strong>Related links:</strong></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><em><a href="http://www.oversixty.co.nz/lifestyle/beauty-style/2015/11/80s-and-90s-beauty-products/">Cult beauty products from the 80s and 90s</a></em></strong></span></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><em><a href="http://www.oversixty.co.nz/lifestyle/beauty-style/2016/01/how-to-stop-lipstick-bleeding/">How to stop lipstick bleeding</a></em></strong></span></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><em><a href="http://www.oversixty.co.nz/lifestyle/beauty-style/2016/01/favourite-looks-from-advance-style-blog/">The best looks from the Advance Style blog</a></em></strong></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: 'Cambria',serif;">The actresses spoke out about their hopes for women in the industry.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: 'Cambria',serif;">"I want young women in particular to know that you can stand up for yourself and fight for what you believe in and still work," Jane Fonda told the magazine. "This is not the '50s anymore." </span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: 'Cambria',serif;"> </span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: 'Cambria',serif;">The carefully critiqued positioning and selection of women on this cover is about more than making just a bold statement; it’s a sign symbolizing that women have power and will not be ignored, not in Hollywood, and not in this world. </span></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

7 rules for fighting fair, according to science

<p>Have you ever had a fight with your partner where you jokingly fantasized about smothering them with your pillow later that night? Do you remember how much energy and time you spent stewing about the argument in the days after, where you rehashed the fight over and over looking for answers? Well apparently this is actually some harmful to your health that it’s a potential killer.</p> <p><strong>1. Petty arguments are VERY bad for your health</strong></p> <p>Yes, that’s right, fighting over the remote or whether your neighbour’s new car is actually a really light green or a very pale blue can lead to an early death. Does it seem so important now?</p> <p>Some researchers at the University of Copenhagen found that those who were sweating the small stuff on a regular basis “had about 50 to 100 percent likelihood of dying from life threatening health conditions.” Sounds like now is the time to take a step back and let it go.</p> <p><strong>2. You can actually go to bed angry</strong></p> <p>While you may want to resolve the issues at hand before you hit the sack, it’s not always the best option. Sleeping in separate rooms while you cool off can actually be beneficial to your relationship. Often we find that in the light of day, the argument is no longer worth finishing anyway.</p> <p><strong>3. The males are more affected</strong></p> <p>Have you noticed that it’s often men dying at an early age from strokes and heart problems? It could be due to fighting. Research has shown that it’s the males who suffer the most stress from a partnership where fighting is the norm.</p> <p><strong>4. Arguing when hungry is never a good idea</strong></p> <p>If you’re already a grump when you’re hungry, try throwing in some lost keys or a forgotten anniversary and see how that makes you feel. There’s no point continuing the fight when all you really need is a sandwich. Shelve the fight, have some food, and then see how you really feel about it later. Chances are, it’s not as serious as it was pre-snack.</p> <p><strong>5. Touching can minimise the damage</strong></p> <p>If it feels like the right thing to do, touching your partner’s arm or body during an argument can actually help reduce the anger. And who knows, it may be just a step or two from ending up in the bedroom for some great make up sex. Well, maybe.</p> <p><strong>6. Be aware that children can be part of the problem</strong></p> <p>It’s not surprising that being a parent can make things even more tense between partners. If it’s not money issues, it could be problems with sibling relationships or even trying to work out where to have Christmas. Be aware of it and remember that it’s perfectly normal to argue when there are kids involved.</p> <p><strong>7. Bottling up your feelings is bad for your health</strong></p> <p>While it’s not a good idea to fight all day about who did or didn’t take out the rubbish, it’s also not ideal to keep your feelings bottled up inside of you. Being able to speak openly to your partner is important, so long as you feel as though you are being heard. There is a big difference between arguing the point and fighting.</p>

Relationships